From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watkins v. Sears Roebuck Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 11, 2001
289 A.D.2d 73 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

5583

December 11, 2001.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard Silver, J.), entered May 22, 2001, dismissing the action for assault and battery upon defendant's motion for judgment as a matter of law made at the close of plaintiff's case, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Marie R. Hodukavich, for plaintiff-appellant.

Marc Rowin, for defendant-respondent.

Before: Rosenberger, J.P. Williams, Tom, Mazzarelli, Ellerin, JJ.


The action was properly dismissed upon plaintiff's trial testimony that his leg was broken when he was tackled from behind, without warning, by a security guard employed by defendant retail store, after he exited the store at a rapid pace with a stolen "boom box" knowing that he might be stopped or chased. Nothing in plaintiff's testimony indicates that he would have heeded a warning to stop, and the guard's use of force admittedly stopped once plaintiff hit the ground (compare, Taggart v. Alexander's, Inc., 90 A.D.2d 542). Given these circumstances, the non-deadly force used by the guard in apprehending a fleeing shoplifter was reasonable as a matter of law (see, General Business Law § 218;cf., Penal Law § 35.30; see, Sindle v. New York City Tr. Auth., 33 N.Y.2d 293, 296-297; cf., e.g., Brown v. State of New York, 250 A.D.2d 796). We have considered plaintiff's other arguments and find them unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Watkins v. Sears Roebuck Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 11, 2001
289 A.D.2d 73 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Watkins v. Sears Roebuck Co.

Case Details

Full title:WALTER WATKINS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. SEARS ROEBUCK COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 11, 2001

Citations

289 A.D.2d 73 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
735 N.Y.S.2d 75

Citing Cases

Townsend v. Waldbaums, Inc.

The plaintiff concludes that any reasonable jury could find that an untrained and inexperienced employee…

Sbrigato v. JC Penny Corp.

Accordingly, the majority of the detention by defendant's employees involved simply waiting for the police,…