From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watkins v. Perkins

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
Feb 7, 2013
No. 4:12-cv-555-DPM (E.D. Ark. Feb. 7, 2013)

Opinion

No. 4:12-cv-555-DPM

02-07-2013

TIMOTHY WATKINS PLAINTIFF v. BRAD PERKINS; DAVID SMITH; and BILLY'S TRUCKING DEFENDANTS


ORDER

The Court was unclear in its 7 December 2013 Order, Document No. 16, about how the Clerk should handle the materials Watkins submitted to chambers. It was the Court's intention that those materials be filed separately and docketed as Watkins's response to the motion to dismiss, Document No. 13. Instead, the Clerk attached the materials to the Court's December 7th Order. The Court directs the Clerk to correct the docket sheet: Watkins's materials should be docketed separately as a response to Perkins and Smiths's motion to dismiss. The Court appreciates the Clerk making this correction.

So Ordered.

_________________________

D.P. Marshall Jr.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Watkins v. Perkins

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
Feb 7, 2013
No. 4:12-cv-555-DPM (E.D. Ark. Feb. 7, 2013)
Case details for

Watkins v. Perkins

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY WATKINS PLAINTIFF v. BRAD PERKINS; DAVID SMITH; and BILLY'S…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 7, 2013

Citations

No. 4:12-cv-555-DPM (E.D. Ark. Feb. 7, 2013)