From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Waterworks Equipment Co. v. McGovern

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 19, 1925
98 N.J. Eq. 701 (N.J. 1925)

Opinion

Argued May term, 1925.

Decided October 19th, 1925.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery.

Mr. Aaron A. Melniker, for the respondent.

Mr. John Milton, for the appellants.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Griffin, whose opinion is reported in 96 N.J. Eq. 520.


The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Griffin.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Waterworks Equipment Co. v. McGovern

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 19, 1925
98 N.J. Eq. 701 (N.J. 1925)
Case details for

Waterworks Equipment Co. v. McGovern

Case Details

Full title:WATERWORKS EQUIPMENT COMPANY, respondent, v. PATRICK M. McGOVERN et al.…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 19, 1925

Citations

98 N.J. Eq. 701 (N.J. 1925)

Citing Cases

Commonwealth Quarry Co. v. Gougherty

One of the matters which must be settled before payment can be made out of a fund is the amount of the fund,…

Schwartz v. Hoffman Foundation, c., Corp.

Our courts adhere to the principle that impossibility of performance offers no relief from the performance of…