From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Waterall v. Waterall

Supreme Court of Alabama
Feb 19, 1959
109 So. 2d 675 (Ala. 1959)

Opinion

1 Div. 801.

February 19, 1959.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Washington County, Joe M. Pelham, Jr., J.

Scott Porter, Chatom, for appellant.

Hurst Williams, Chatom, for appellee.


This is an appeal from an interlocutory decree overruling demurrer to a bill in equity.

The appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal because the brief of appellant was not filed within the time prescribed by Supreme Court Rule 12, Code 1940, Tit. 7 Appendix. The motion is well taken.

Supreme Court Rule 12 provides: "Counsel for appellant shall file his brief with the clerk of this court within thirty days after the transcript of the record has been filed in this court. Upon failure to so file, the appeal shall be dismissed or the case affirmed, as the case may be".

Prior to the adoption of Revised Rule 47 on the 17th day of February, 1956 (263 Ala. XXII), Rule 12 was held not to apply to cases having a preferred standing on appeal to this court. Terry v. State ex rel. Pettus, 264 Ala. 133, 85 So.2d 449, construing old Rule 47. However, old Rule 47 was substituted by Revised Rule 47, supra, and cases of the status here considered are also governed by Rule 12. See Phalen v. Fort, 266 Ala. 213, 95 So.2d 401 and Tipton v. Tipton, 267 Ala. 64, 100 So.2d 14.

Motion granted.

Appeal dismissed.

LAWSON, STAKELY, MERRILL, and COLEMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Waterall v. Waterall

Supreme Court of Alabama
Feb 19, 1959
109 So. 2d 675 (Ala. 1959)
Case details for

Waterall v. Waterall

Case Details

Full title:Wilma Lee Lindsey WATERALL v. Charles J. WATERALL

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Feb 19, 1959

Citations

109 So. 2d 675 (Ala. 1959)
109 So. 2d 675

Citing Cases

Muncy v. General Investment Company

This holding has been consistently followed. Ex parte N.A.A.C.P., 268 Ala. 504, 109 So.2d 140; Waterall v.…

Moore v. Moore

We granted an extension to January 13, 1966, but appellant's briefs were not filed prior to or on that date.…