From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wasserstein v. McCarthy

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 7, 2017
147 A.D.3d 464 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

02-07-2017

In re PAMELA S. Wasserstein, et al., Petitioners–Respondents, v. Erin McCARTHY, Respondent–Appellant. In re Ellis Jones, Petitioner–Respondent, v. Erin McCarthy, Respondent–Appellant. In re Pamela S. Wasserstein, et al., Petitioners–Respondents, v. Erin McCarthy, Respondent–Appellant.

Carroll McNulty & Kull, LLC, New York (Christopher R. Carroll of counsel), for appellant. Milbank, Tweed, Handley & McCloy LLP, New York (Robert C. Hora of counsel), for Pamela S. Wasserstein, Ben C. Wasserstein and A.D. Scoop Wasserstein, respondents. Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, New York (Andrew G. Gordon of counsel), for Anup Bagaria, Ellis B. Jones and George L. Majoros, Jr., respondents. Solomon Blum Heymann LLP, New York (Charles F. Gibbs of counsel), for Dash P. Wasserstein and Jack D. Wasserstein, respondents. Farrell Fritz, Uniondale (Eric W. Penzer of counsel), for Sky W.E. Wasserstein, respondent.


Carroll McNulty & Kull, LLC, New York (Christopher R. Carroll of counsel), for appellant.

Milbank, Tweed, Handley & McCloy LLP, New York (Robert C. Hora of counsel), for Pamela S. Wasserstein, Ben C. Wasserstein and A.D. Scoop Wasserstein, respondents.

Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, New York (Andrew G. Gordon of counsel), for Anup Bagaria, Ellis B. Jones and George L. Majoros, Jr., respondents.

Solomon Blum Heymann LLP, New York (Charles F. Gibbs of counsel), for Dash P. Wasserstein and Jack D. Wasserstein, respondents.

Farrell Fritz, Uniondale (Eric W. Penzer of counsel), for Sky W.E. Wasserstein, respondent.

Appeals from decrees, Surrogate's Court, New York County (Nora S. Anderson, S.), entered on or about May 22, 2015, which approved petitioner trustees' proposed distributions, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from nonappealable decrees.

Respondent failed to file objections to petitioners' accounts, thereby defaulting in this proceeding (see Matter of E. & H. Goldstein Family Trust, 81 A.D.3d 728, 916 N.Y.S.2d 223 [2d Dept.2011] ). No appeal lies from an order entered upon default (CPLR 5511 ; see e.g. Matter of Dietz, 29 N.Y.2d 915, 328 N.Y.S.2d 864, 279 N.E.2d 607 [1972] ; Goldstein, 81 A.D.3d at 729, 916 N.Y.S.2d 223 ).

FRIEDMAN, J.P., ANDRIAS, MOSKOWITZ, KAPNICK, KAHN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wasserstein v. McCarthy

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 7, 2017
147 A.D.3d 464 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Wasserstein v. McCarthy

Case Details

Full title:In re PAMELA S. Wasserstein, et al., Petitioners–Respondents, v. Erin…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 7, 2017

Citations

147 A.D.3d 464 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
147 A.D.3d 464
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 943