From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wasserman v. Schwartz

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 29, 1943
31 A.2d 820 (N.J. 1943)

Opinion

Argued February 4, 1943 —

Decided April 29, 1943.

Appeals of Max Schnoll.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 129 N.J.L. 224.

For the respondents, John W. McGeehan, Jr.

For the defendants, Lindabury, Depue Faulks.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, DONGES, PERSKIE, DEAR, WELLS, RAFFERTY, JJ. 6.

For reversal — CASE, BODINE, HEHER, JJ. 3.

For modification — THOMPSON, J. 1.


Summaries of

Wasserman v. Schwartz

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 29, 1943
31 A.2d 820 (N.J. 1943)
Case details for

Wasserman v. Schwartz

Case Details

Full title:RENEE WASSERMAN, AN INFANT, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. SOL SCHWARTZ ET AL.…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Apr 29, 1943

Citations

31 A.2d 820 (N.J. 1943)
31 A.2d 820

Citing Cases

Siciliano v. United States

nt of Wiegand or for the acts of Wiegand so employed, it was responsible for the acts and omissions of…

Green v. Bell Cleaners

The following cases are a few illustrations of slight deviations or detours by employees, during which the…