From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wasserman v. Lupis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1928
223 A.D. 773 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Opinion

March, 1928.


Order granting motion to punish defendant for contempt reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The provisions in the judgment directing defendant to pay money to plaintiffs may only be enforced by execution and may not be enforced by proceedings in contempt. (Gen. Const. Law, § 28-a; Judiciary Law, § 753, subd. 3; Civ. Prac. Act, § 504, subd. 1; Id. § 505, subds. 1, 2, 4; Kittel v. Stueve, 11 Misc. 279; affd., 146 N.Y. 380; Harris v. Elliott, 163 id. 269; Leerburger v. Watson, 169 App. Div. 48, 52.) Rich, Young, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P.J., dissents.

Added by Laws of 1920, chap. 917. — [REP.


Summaries of

Wasserman v. Lupis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1928
223 A.D. 773 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)
Case details for

Wasserman v. Lupis

Case Details

Full title:JESSE H. WASSERMAN and SELMA WASSERMAN, Respondents, v. "GEORGE" AREZZO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1928

Citations

223 A.D. 773 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Citing Cases

People ex Rel. Bellovin v. Sheriff of Kings County

The judgment roll in the action of Milruth and Geltner against the relator, which was submitted to the court…

National Sur. Corp. v. Silver

(See CPLR 5105; Carmody-Wait, N.Y. Prac., supra; 5 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N Y Civ. Prac., par. 5105.01;…