Opinion
No. 2D14–1821.
09-10-2014
William Washington, pro se.
William Washington, pro se.
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See State v. Roby, 246 So.2d 566 (Fla.1971) ; Doby v. State, 25 So.3d 598 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) ; Hughes v. State, 22 So.3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) ; Franke v. State, 997 So.2d 424 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) ; Henry v. State, 933 So.2d 28 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) ; Steward v. State, 931 So.2d 133 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) ; Bizzell v. State, 912 So.2d 386 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) ; Shortridge v. State, 884 So.2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) ; Brown v. State, 827 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) ; Lopez v. State, 833 So.2d 283 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) ; Roberts v. State, 813 So.2d 1016 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) ; Freeny v. State, 621 So.2d 505 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).
DAVIS, C.J., and CRENSHAW and BLACK, JJ., Concur.