From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Washington v. Lucus

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 28, 2017
Civil Action No. 3:16-cv-00123 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 28, 2017)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:16-cv-00123

03-28-2017

BILAL WASHINGTON, Plaintiff, v. PENNY LUCUS, et al., Defendants.

cc: BILAL WASHINGTON DN-6273 SCI Somerset 1600 Walters Mill Road Somerset, PA 15510 (via U.S. First Class Mail) Mary Lynch Friedline Office of Attorney General (via ECF electronic notification) Timothy Mazzocca Office of Attorney General (via ECF electronic notification)


MEMORANDUM ORDER

This case was commenced on June 6, 2016, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and the Local Rules of Court for Magistrate Judges. Upon Plaintiff's compliance with the statutory requirements, his motion to proceed in forma pauperis was granted on July 13, 2016. (ECF No. 7.)

Defendants filed a motion to dismiss (ECF No. 22) arguing that the Amended Complaint should be dismissed for failure to state a claim, to which Plaintiff responded in opposition (ECF No. 25). On March 1, 2017, Magistrate Judge Eddy filed a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 27) recommending that Defendants' motion to dismiss be granted. Plaintiff was served with the Report and Recommendation at his listed address and was advised that he had until March 20, 2017, to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. To date, Plaintiff has not filed any objections nor has he sought an extension of time in which to do so.

After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 28th day of March, 2017:

1. Defendants' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 22) is GRANTED; and

2. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 27) dated March 1, 2017, is ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this case CLOSED.

AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Plaintiff has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

BY THE COURT:

/s/_________

Kim R. Gibson

United States District Judge cc: BILAL WASHINGTON

DN-6273

SCI Somerset

1600 Walters Mill Road

Somerset, PA 15510

(via U.S. First Class Mail)

Mary Lynch Friedline

Office of Attorney General

(via ECF electronic notification)

Timothy Mazzocca

Office of Attorney General

(via ECF electronic notification)


Summaries of

Washington v. Lucus

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 28, 2017
Civil Action No. 3:16-cv-00123 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 28, 2017)
Case details for

Washington v. Lucus

Case Details

Full title:BILAL WASHINGTON, Plaintiff, v. PENNY LUCUS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Mar 28, 2017

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:16-cv-00123 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 28, 2017)

Citing Cases

Washington v. Hoffmann

This court has previously denied another claim of verbal threats and sexual harassment levied by Plaintiff…