From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Washington v. Hutchinson

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Dec 30, 2009
Case no. 08-12787 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 30, 2009)

Summary

refusing to order specific medical treatment because the "Court is ill-equipped to unilaterally micro-manage prison administration . . . ."

Summary of this case from Lindensmith v. Walton

Opinion

Case no. 08-12787.

December 30, 2009


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


The Court having reviewed Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen's Report and Recommendation, filed September 25, 2009, as well as any objections thereto filed by the parties, and being fully advised in the premises;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted by this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the two remaining defendants, J. Parush and Leona M. Davis are sua sponte DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).


Summaries of

Washington v. Hutchinson

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Dec 30, 2009
Case no. 08-12787 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 30, 2009)

refusing to order specific medical treatment because the "Court is ill-equipped to unilaterally micro-manage prison administration . . . ."

Summary of this case from Lindensmith v. Walton
Case details for

Washington v. Hutchinson

Case Details

Full title:CLARENCE WASHINGTON, Plaintiff, v. CRAIG HUTCHINSON, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Dec 30, 2009

Citations

Case no. 08-12787 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 30, 2009)

Citing Cases

Stine v. Allred

Here, Mr. Stine would have the court effectively micro-manage the provision of dental care at ADX and intrude…

Lindensmith v. Walton

Theriot v. Woods, No. 2:09-CV-199, 2010 WL 623684, at *4 (W.D. Mich. Feb. 18, 2010) (demand to terminate MDOC…