From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Washington v. Caliguiri

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jun 12, 2012
96 A.D.3d 519 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-06-12

In re Allen GUTTERMAN, et al., Petitioners–Appellants, v. Edward CALIGUIRI, et al., Respondents–Respondents.

A. Bernard Frechtman, New York, for appellants. The Perecman Firm, PLLC, New York (David Perecman of counsel), for respondents.


A. Bernard Frechtman, New York, for appellants. The Perecman Firm, PLLC, New York (David Perecman of counsel), for respondents.

*880Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Jane Goodman, J.), entered May 24, 2011, denying petitioners' motion to vacate an arbitration award, and confirming the award, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioners failed to establish that the award was irrational ( see Kalyanaram v. New York Inst. of Tech., 79 A.D.3d 418, 419–420, 913 N.Y.S.2d 159 [2010],lv. denied17 N.Y.3d 712, 2011 WL 4916491 [2011] ).

We have considered petitioners' remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

TOM, J.P., MAZZARELLI, MOSKOWITZ, RENWICK, ABDUS–SALAAM, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Washington v. Caliguiri

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jun 12, 2012
96 A.D.3d 519 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Washington v. Caliguiri

Case Details

Full title:In re Allen GUTTERMAN, et al., Petitioners–Appellants, v. Edward…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 12, 2012

Citations

96 A.D.3d 519 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 4696
945 N.Y.S.2d 879