From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wasden v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Jul 8, 2022
342 So. 3d 298 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

Case No. 5D21-2649

07-08-2022

Richard Keith WASDEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Scott G. Hubbard, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Whitney Brown Hartless, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Scott G. Hubbard, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Whitney Brown Hartless, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

WALLIS, J. In this Anders appeal, we affirm the judgment and sentence entered following Appellant's open plea to violating his probation with two exceptions. First, none of the written documents from the trial court identify the conditions of probation that Appellant was found to have violated. Second, the trial court imposed $150 that was identified as "Prosecution/Investigation Costs." However, the record does not reflect that the State asked for a higher cost of prosecution or for costs of investigation. Absent a specific request from the State, the maximum permissible cost for a felony prosecution is $100. § 938.27(8), Fla. Stat. (2021). We therefore affirm but remand with instructions for the trial court to enter a written order specifying the violated conditions and to correct the order to reduce the cost of prosecution to $100. See Berg v. State, 313 So. 3d 930 (Fla. 5th DCA 2021) ; Crichton v. State, 299 So. 3d 616 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020).

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED with Instructions.

EISNAUGLE and SASSO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wasden v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Jul 8, 2022
342 So. 3d 298 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Wasden v. State

Case Details

Full title:Richard Keith WASDEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Jul 8, 2022

Citations

342 So. 3d 298 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Citing Cases

Parks v. State

Finally, we recognize the conflict of district court opinions on this issue. Compare, e.g., D.L.J. v. State,…

O'Malley v. State

[thus], the trial court did not commit error by imposing the $100 statutory minimum costs under section…