From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Warren v. VIP Auto Servs. Ctr.

Supreme Court of Nevada
Sep 17, 2024
No. 88821 (Nev. Sep. 17, 2024)

Opinion

88821

09-17-2024

ALLANNA WARREN, Appellant, v. VIP AUTO SERVICES CENTER, INC.; LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT; DOE LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICERS (1-50); MARQUIS AND AURBACH DOE EMPLOYEE (1-50); JACKIE NICHOLS; AND REESE LEVINS, Respondents.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a post-judgment district court order declaring appellant a vexatious litigant. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Jacob A. Reynolds, Judge.

Review of the notice of appeal and documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, a post-judgment order declaring a party to be a vexatious litigant is not an independently appealable order, and no other statute or court rule appears to allow an appeal from the challenged order. See Peck v. Crouser, 129 Nev. 120, 295 P.3d 586 (2013) (providing that a post-judgment vexatious litigant determination is not independently appealable); Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this court "may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule"). Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction and ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Herndon, J., Lee, J., Bell, J.

Hon. Jacob A. Reynolds, District Judge


Summaries of

Warren v. VIP Auto Servs. Ctr.

Supreme Court of Nevada
Sep 17, 2024
No. 88821 (Nev. Sep. 17, 2024)
Case details for

Warren v. VIP Auto Servs. Ctr.

Case Details

Full title:ALLANNA WARREN, Appellant, v. VIP AUTO SERVICES CENTER, INC.; LAS VEGAS…

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada

Date published: Sep 17, 2024

Citations

No. 88821 (Nev. Sep. 17, 2024)