From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Warren v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Nov 15, 2012
381 P.3d 674 (Nev. 2012)

Opinion

No. 60268.

11-15-2012

Ray Lavonta WARREN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.

Clark County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney


Clark County Public Defender

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is an appeal from a district court order revoking appellant Ray Lavonta Warren's probation. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Donald M. Mosley, Judge.

Warren contends that the district court abused its discretion by revoking his probation “because there simply wasn't enough evidence adduced at the revocation hearing for which the district court could have determined that [his] conduct was not as good as required by the conditions of probation.” At the revocation hearing, however, Warren conceded that he failed to comply with the conditions of his probation and stipulated to the violations listed in the report prepared by the Division of Parole and Probation. See generally McNallen v. State, 91 Nev. 592, 540 P.2d 121 (1975) (revocation of probation affirmed where violation by probationer not refuted). The district court found that Warren's conduct was not as good as required after noting that, among other things, he pleaded guilty to another drug offense while on probation. See Lewis v. State. 90 Nev. 436, 438, 529 P.2d 796, 797 (1974). We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by revoking Warren's probation, see id., and we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Warren v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Nov 15, 2012
381 P.3d 674 (Nev. 2012)
Case details for

Warren v. State

Case Details

Full title:Ray Lavonta WARREN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: Nov 15, 2012

Citations

381 P.3d 674 (Nev. 2012)