From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Warren v. Cedar Hill Cemetery Assoc

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 21, 2000
277 A.D.2d 371 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted October 26, 2000.

November 21, 2000.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for fraud and breach of contract, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Owen, J.), dated October 5, 1999, which denied their motions pursuant to CPLR 8018(a) to require each plaintiff to commence a separate action, and to require the out-of-state plaintiffs to provide security for costs.

Thorn and Gershon, LLP, Albany, N.Y. (Kyle N. Kordich and Maureen S. Bonanni of counsel), for appellants.

Finkelstein, Levine, Gittelsohn Partners, Newburgh, N Y (Stephen Lim and Andrew J. Genna of counsel), for respondents.

Before: CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., WILLIAM C. THOMPSON, SONDRA MILLER, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

CPLR 8018(a) provides that the County Clerk shall be paid a fee of $170 "for the assignment of an index number to an action" pending before the court. It is not disputed that this action is a single action pending before the court. Neither the CPLR nor any case law requires the payment of additional index number fees in a case where, as here, there are multiple plaintiffs.

In any event, the court correctly concluded that the defendants' motion, insofar as it requests that each plaintiff commence a separate action, was premature under the circumstances — even had it been properly brought to correct an alleged misjoinder under CPLR 1003 (see, e.g., Akely v. Kinnicutt, 238 N.Y. 466; cf., Annunziato v. City of New York, 224 A.D.2d 31, 41; Bender v. Underwood, 93 A.D.2d 747; Korren v. Eli Lilly Co., 150 Misc.2d 429; CPLR 1002[a]).

Orange County is the proper venue for this action, as many of the plaintiffs and one of the defendants reside in Orange County (see, e.g., Smith v. Spencer, 182 Misc. 767; CPLR 503[a]).

Finally, where the majority of the plaintiffs are New York State residents, the court correctly denied the defendants' motion to require the out-of-state plaintiffs to provide security for costs (see, Salimoff Co. v. Standard Oil Co. of New York, 259 N.Y. 219).


Summaries of

Warren v. Cedar Hill Cemetery Assoc

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 21, 2000
277 A.D.2d 371 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Warren v. Cedar Hill Cemetery Assoc

Case Details

Full title:MELISSA A. WARREN, ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. CEDAR HILL CEMETERY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 21, 2000

Citations

277 A.D.2d 371 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
717 N.Y.S.2d 213

Citing Cases

MTR. OF ACEVEDO v. City of NY

"Neither the CPLR nor any case law requires the payment of additional index number fees in a case where, as…

Galu v. Cedar Hill Cemetery Ass'n

DECISION ORDER ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs (see, Warren v. Cedar Hill Cemetery…