From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Warner v. McVey

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 16, 2009
Civil Action No. 08-55 Erie (W.D. Pa. Mar. 16, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 08-55 Erie.

March 16, 2009


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This civil rights action was received by the Clerk of Court on February 20, 2008, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 30], filed on February 27, 2009, recommended that the motion to dismiss or alternatively, for judgment on the pleadings, filed by the Department of Corrections Defendants [Doc. No. 27] be denied. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the motion and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 16th day of March, 2009;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to dismiss or alternatively, for judgment on the pleadings, filed by the Department of Corrections Defendants [Doc. No. 27] is DENIED.

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 30] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on February 27, 2009, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

Warner v. McVey

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 16, 2009
Civil Action No. 08-55 Erie (W.D. Pa. Mar. 16, 2009)
Case details for

Warner v. McVey

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD LAWRENCE WARNER, Plaintiff, v. CATHERINE McVEY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 16, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 08-55 Erie (W.D. Pa. Mar. 16, 2009)

Citing Cases

Straker v. Deutsche Bank National Trust

A Rule 12(b)(1) motion "may be treated as either a facial or factual challenge to the court's subject matter…

Peraza v. United States

A Rule 12(b)(1) motion "may be treated as either a facial or factual challenge to the court's subject matter…