From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Warner v. Doscher

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 12, 1926
150 N.E. 574 (N.Y. 1926)

Summary

In Warner v. Doscher (241 N.Y. 605), also cited by both parties, the trial court disposed of the case upon the theory that existing tenancies constituted incumbrances and attached little importance to the fact that a transfer tax had remained unpaid.

Summary of this case from Midurban Realty Corp. v. F.D. L.R. Corp.

Opinion

Argued December 8, 1925

Decided January 12, 1926

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

Henry F. Cochrane for appellants.

Harold Swain and Henry Hetkin for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE, ANDREWS and LEHMAN, JJ.


Summaries of

Warner v. Doscher

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 12, 1926
150 N.E. 574 (N.Y. 1926)

In Warner v. Doscher (241 N.Y. 605), also cited by both parties, the trial court disposed of the case upon the theory that existing tenancies constituted incumbrances and attached little importance to the fact that a transfer tax had remained unpaid.

Summary of this case from Midurban Realty Corp. v. F.D. L.R. Corp.
Case details for

Warner v. Doscher

Case Details

Full title:ANNA WARNER, Respondent, v. HENRY DOSCHER et al., Individually and as…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 12, 1926

Citations

150 N.E. 574 (N.Y. 1926)
150 N.E. 574

Citing Cases

WIJA BUILDING CORPORATION v. KAY-WEI BLDG. CORP

( Ziehen v. Smith, 148 N.Y. 558; Higgins v. Eagleton, 155 id. 466; Vandegrift v. Cowles Engineering Co., 161…

Midurban Realty Corp. v. F.D. L.R. Corp.

Smith v. Browning ( 225 N.Y. 358), cited by both parties, defines rules to control the ascertainment of a tax…