Opinion
Civil Action No. 08-cv-00176-BNB.
April 24, 2008
ORDER
Plaintiff has filed pro se on April 17, 2008, a document titled "Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a) and/or 72(b)(2) Objections to U.S. Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland's April 2, 2008[,] Order Regarding Recusal." Plaintiff objects to the portion of Magistrate Judge Boland's Order filed in this action on April 2, 2008, that denied Plaintiff's "Motion to Recuse All Judges (District and Magistrate) of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado." Plaintiff argues that he provided a sufficient factual basis in support of the motion to recuse. For the reasons stated below, the objections will be overruled.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) a judge may reconsider any pretrial matter designated to a magistrate judge to hear and determine where it has been shown that the magistrate judge's order is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. The Court has reviewed the file and finds that Magistrate Judge Boland's April 2 order is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Plaintiff fails to allege specific facts that demonstrate disqualification of all of the district judges and magistrate judges in the District of Colorado is appropriate in this action. Therefore, Plaintiffs objections will be overruled. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that Plaintiff's objections filed on April 17, 2008, are overruled.