From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wardell v. Am. Dairy Goat Ass'n

United States District Court, District of Colorado
Feb 28, 2022
Civil Action 21-cv-01186-PAB-NRN (D. Colo. Feb. 28, 2022)

Summary

finding that a national dairy goat association's volume of business in Colorado was insufficient under Kuenzle, even when it had held two shows, sanctioned six others, performed appraisals, and issued testing permits for goat herds in the State

Summary of this case from Zayo Grp. v. 6x7 Networks, LLC

Opinion

Civil Action 21-cv-01186-PAB-NRN

02-28-2022

W. ROBERT WARDELL, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN DAIRY GOAT ASSOCIATION, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RECOMMENDATION

PHILIP A. BRIMMER, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter filed on February 8, 2022 [Docket No. 85]. The Recommendation states that objections to the Recommendation must be filed within fourteen days after its service on the parties. Docket No. 85 at 17-18; see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The Recommendation was served on February 8, 2022. No. party has objected to the Recommendation.

In the absence of an objection, the district court may review a magistrate judge's recommendation under any standard it deems appropriate. See Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985) (“It does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate's factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings.”). In this matter, the Court has reviewed the Recommendation to satisfy itself that there is “no clear error on the face of the record.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), advisory committee notes. Based on this review, the Court has concluded that the Recommendation is a correct application of the facts and the law. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:

This standard of review is something less than a “clearly erroneous or contrary to law” standard of review, Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a), which in turn is less than a de novo review. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b).

1. The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter [Docket No. 85] is ACCEPTED;

2. Defendant American Dairy Goat Association's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Improper Venue [Docket No. 59] is DENIED; and

3. This action shall be transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a).


Summaries of

Wardell v. Am. Dairy Goat Ass'n

United States District Court, District of Colorado
Feb 28, 2022
Civil Action 21-cv-01186-PAB-NRN (D. Colo. Feb. 28, 2022)

finding that a national dairy goat association's volume of business in Colorado was insufficient under Kuenzle, even when it had held two shows, sanctioned six others, performed appraisals, and issued testing permits for goat herds in the State

Summary of this case from Zayo Grp. v. 6x7 Networks, LLC

deciding venue before personal jurisdiction

Summary of this case from Nw. Bldg. Components v. Adams
Case details for

Wardell v. Am. Dairy Goat Ass'n

Case Details

Full title:W. ROBERT WARDELL, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN DAIRY GOAT ASSOCIATION…

Court:United States District Court, District of Colorado

Date published: Feb 28, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 21-cv-01186-PAB-NRN (D. Colo. Feb. 28, 2022)

Citing Cases

Zayo Grp. v. 6x7 Networks, LLC

Assuming the amount of Defendant's unpaid balances to be true, this is still insufficient to show that…

Nw. Bldg. Components v. Adams

Thus, courts may properly consider venue arguments before deciding personal jurisdiction. Wardell v. Am.…