From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ward v. Murphy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 27, 2003
302 A.D.2d 839 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

92525

Decided and Entered: February 27, 2003.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Kevin Ward, Marcy, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Spain, Carpinello and Rose, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting assault on an inmate and possession of a weapon. The misbehavior report charged that petitioner, armed with the lid of a tin can, had assaulted another inmate, causing him to suffer facial lacerations. Substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt was presented in the form of the misbehavior report and confidential testimony given by the correction officer who investigated the matter and by an eyewitness to the assault who positively identified petitioner as the assailant who had cut the victim with a can lid (see Matter of Kemp v. Goord, 285 A.D.2d 943, 944). Petitioner's assertion that the Hearing Officer failed to make an independent assessment of the credibility of the confidential informant is belied by the record which discloses that the Hearing Officer personally interviewed both the informant and the correction officer to whom the information was given at which time he was able to assess their credibility and the reliability of their information (see Matter of Abdur-Raheem v. Mann, 85 N.Y.2d 113, 119; Matter of Petty v. Selsky, 289 A.D.2d 859, 860, lv denied 98 N.Y.2d 602). Petitioner's remaining contentions, including his assertion of hearing officer bias, have been examined and found to be without merit.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Spain, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Ward v. Murphy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 27, 2003
302 A.D.2d 839 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Ward v. Murphy

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of KEVIN WARD, Petitioner, v. ROBERT J. MURPHY, as Acting…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 27, 2003

Citations

302 A.D.2d 839 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
754 N.Y.S.2d 607

Citing Cases

People

Where the hearing officer interviews the confidential informer who supplies the needed information (even if…

In the Matter of Thomassini v. Goord

The misbehavior report, together with the testimony of the correction officers who investigated the incident…