From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ward v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Apr 19, 2013
CASE NO. 5:12CV00223 BSM (E.D. Ark. Apr. 19, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 5:12CV00223 BSM

04-19-2013

JOSHUA S. WARD ADC #152396 PETITIONER v. RAY HOBBS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction RESPONDENT


ORDER

The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray have been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT this petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C.§ 2254 [Doc. No. 3] is denied and this case is dismissed with prejudice. It is further ordered that a certificate of appealability is denied pursuant to Rule 11(a) if the rules governing section 2254 cases in the United States District Courts.

_______________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Ward v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Apr 19, 2013
CASE NO. 5:12CV00223 BSM (E.D. Ark. Apr. 19, 2013)
Case details for

Ward v. Hobbs

Case Details

Full title:JOSHUA S. WARD ADC #152396 PETITIONER v. RAY HOBBS, Director, Arkansas…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Date published: Apr 19, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 5:12CV00223 BSM (E.D. Ark. Apr. 19, 2013)