From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ward v. Couch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 1, 1915
167 App. Div. 948 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)

Opinion

March, 1915.


The case having been settled ( Vandenbergh v. Mathews, 52 App. Div. 616), and the papers not having been printed, filed and served within the time required by rule 41 of the General Rules of Practice, the appellant is in default. Appellant's counsel has evidently failed to notice that since the repeal of rule 35 and the amendment of rule 41 by striking out the words "and filing," the time limited for filing and serving the printed record on appeal, where a case and exceptions has been settled, commences to run from the date of settlement, and not as formerly, from the date of the filing of the case signed by the judge or referee who tried the case. The appellant not having excused his default in any way, the motion should be granted, without prejudice, however, to a motion to be relieved from such default. Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs, including ten dollars costs of this motion, without prejudice to an application by appellant to be relieved from his default.


Summaries of

Ward v. Couch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 1, 1915
167 App. Div. 948 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)
Case details for

Ward v. Couch

Case Details

Full title:OLIVE WARD, by GEORGE W. WARD, Her Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v . EARL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1915

Citations

167 App. Div. 948 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)