From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wanner v. Corningpainted Post Area S. Dist. [4th Dept 1999

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 10, 1999
(N.Y. App. Div. May. 10, 1999)

Opinion

May 10, 1999

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Steuben County, Scudder, J. — Summary Judgment.

PRESENT: GREEN, J. P., PINE, WISNER, CALLAHAN AND BALIO, JJ.


Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court properly refused to dismiss the complaint in its entirety. Defendant failed to meet its burden on its motion for summary judgment of establishing as a matter of law that plaintiff, a former guidance counselor, is not entitled to compensation for working 20.5 days beyond the work year as defined in the collective bargaining agreement ( see, Furman v. Wachtman, 229 A.D.2d 358, 358-359; Moors v. Hall, 143 A.D.2d 336, 338).

We modify the order, however, by granting that part of the motion seeking dismissal of plaintiff's claim for punitive damages. Defendant's alleged "willful, intentional and malicious" refusal to abide by the terms of the agreement does not support an award of punitive damages ( see, Estate of Roth v. Erhal Holding Corp., 141 A.D.2d 693, 695-696).


Summaries of

Wanner v. Corningpainted Post Area S. Dist. [4th Dept 1999

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 10, 1999
(N.Y. App. Div. May. 10, 1999)
Case details for

Wanner v. Corningpainted Post Area S. Dist. [4th Dept 1999

Case Details

Full title:JANICE WANNER, RESPONDENT, v. CORNINGPAINTED POST AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 10, 1999

Citations

(N.Y. App. Div. May. 10, 1999)