Opinion
Argued December 19, 1892
Decided January 17, 1893
C.D. Kiehel for appellant.
John Van Voorhis for respondent.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Wannamaker v. City of Rochester
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 17, 1893
137 N.Y. 529 (N.Y. 1893)
Summaries of
Wannamaker v. City of Rochester
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 17, 1893
137 N.Y. 529 (N.Y. 1893)
Case details for
Wannamaker v. City of Rochester
Case Details
Full title:THERESA WANNAMAKER, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v . THE CITY OF…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jan 17, 1893
Citations
137 N.Y. 529 (N.Y. 1893)
50 N.Y. St. Rptr. 930
Citing Cases
Sweeney v. Vacuum Oil Company
Be that as it may, I have reached the conclusion that the question as to whether such place was safe or as to…