From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walton v. Reed

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 23, 2018
Case No. 17-13945 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 23, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 17-13945

07-23-2018

LEROY WALTON, Plaintiff, v. KASEEM REED, ET AL., Defendants.


MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVID R. GRAND

ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR PURPOSES OF RES JUDICATA AND FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

Plaintiff filed a Complaint [1] on December 6, 2017 against a number of state and local officials in Georgia, including the State of Georgia, former Mayor of Atlanta Kasim Reed, Judge Gary Jackson, and Paul L. Howard, Jr., the Fulton County District Attorney. On May 10, 2018, the Court issued an Order [6] directing Plaintiff to submit a response by June 11, 2018, explaining why this case should not be dismissed due to lack of prosecution and the fact that it is virtually identical to a case filed in the Northern District of Georgia. See Walton v. Reed, No. 1:17-CV-00875. That case was dismissed on January 3, 2018 because Plaintiff failed to timely file an amended complaint.

Pursuant to Eastern District of Michigan Local Rule 41.2, "when it appears ... that the parties have taken no action for a reasonable time, the court may, on its own motion ... enter an order dismissing or remanding the case unless good cause is shown." E.D. MICH. LOCAL R. 41.2. Plaintiff has submitted no response to the Court's Order [6], and has therefore failed to show good cause.

Additionally - and perhaps, more importantly - this is duplicative litigation. Plaintiff has "no right to maintain two separate actions involving the same subject matter at the same time . . . and against the same defendants." Walton v. Eaton Corp., 563 F.2d 66, 70 (3d Cir. 1977). Plaintiff's in forma pauperis complaint, which "merely repeats pending or previously litigated claims," is subject to dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(i) as frivolous. Belser v. Heidi Washington, 2016 WL 6275343, at *1 (W.D. Mich. Oct. 27, 2016) (citing McWilliams v. State of Colo., 121 F.3d 573, 574 (10th Cir. 1997)).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED.

SO ORDERED.

s/Arthur J. Tarnow

Arthur J. Tarnow

Senior United States District Judge Dated: July 23, 2018


Summaries of

Walton v. Reed

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 23, 2018
Case No. 17-13945 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 23, 2018)
Case details for

Walton v. Reed

Case Details

Full title:LEROY WALTON, Plaintiff, v. KASEEM REED, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 23, 2018

Citations

Case No. 17-13945 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 23, 2018)