Opinion
01-03-2017
In re WALTER S., Jr., Petitioner–Appellant, v. CYNTHIA H., Respondent–Respondent.
George E. Reed, Jr., White Plains, for appellant. Tennille M. Tatum–Evans, New York, for respondent. Karen Freedman, Lawyers for Children, Inc, New York (Shirim Nothenberg of counsel), attorney for the child.
George E. Reed, Jr., White Plains, for appellant.
Tennille M. Tatum–Evans, New York, for respondent.
Karen Freedman, Lawyers for Children, Inc, New York (Shirim Nothenberg of counsel), attorney for the child.
FRIEDMAN, J.P., SWEENY, RICHTER, MANZANET–DANIELS, KAPNICK, JJ.
Appeal from order, Family Court, New York County (Gail A. Adams, Referee), entered on or about December 7, 2015, which transferred the petition to modify visitation to Suffolk County Family Court, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable paper.
The order transferring the petition to Suffolk County is not a final order of disposition and is not appealable as of right (see Family Court Act § 1112 [a]; Matter of Lydia D. v. Thomas B., 99 A.D.3d 586, 951 N.Y.S.2d 879 [1st Dept.2012] ). Moreover, the father did not object to the transfer of the petition, and his claim that it was an improvident exercise of the court's discretion is therefore unpreserved (see e.g. Roberta P. v. Vanessa J. P., 140 A.D.3d 457, 458, 31 N.Y.S.3d 507 [1st Dept.2016], lv. denied 28 N.Y.3d 904, 2016 WL 6113618 [2016] ). Furthermore, since the petition has since been dismissed, the issue is academic.
Were we to consider the merits, we would find that the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in transferring the petition to Suffolk County, where the mother's family offense petition was pending, in order to accommodate the child's school schedule and where the mother and the child reside (see e.g. Greenblum v. Greenblum, 136 A.D.3d 595, 25 N.Y.S.3d 598 [1st Dept.2016] ). The father failed to demonstrate that the transfer was a hardship to him due to his health.