From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walter John Harris v. Joseph L. Donovan

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Jul 31, 1964
129 N.W.2d 797 (Minn. 1964)

Summary

holding that depositing affidavit of candidacy in mail does not constitute "filing" within meaning of statute

Summary of this case from Butts v. Bysiewicz

Opinion

No. 39,594.

July 31, 1964.

Elections — affidavit of candidacy — filing — timeliness.

Order to show cause in this court why the secretary of state, Joseph L. Donovan, should not be required to accept the affidavit of petitioner, Walter John Harris, and to place his name upon the primary election ballot as a candidate for the Republican nomination for the office of representative in Congress. Petition denied.

Alfred J. Weinberg and Weinberg Litman, for petitioner.

Walter F. Mondale, Attorney General, and David M. Lebedoff, Special Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.


Pursuant to Minn. St. 203.38, petitioner seeks an order requiring the secretary of state to accept his affidavit of candidacy for nomination as Republican representative in Congress for the Eighth Congressional District in the primary election to be held September 8, 1964.

The statutory deadline for the secretary of state's acceptance of the affidavit was 5 p. m., Tuesday, July 14, 1964. §§ 202.04, subd. 1, and 202.06, subd. 2. On Monday, July 13, 1964, at 11 a. m., petitioner took the affidavit to the main post office at Duluth, Minnesota, for mailing to the secretary of state, and was assured by the postal clerk that it would be delivered the following morning. At 9 p. m. on Tuesday, July 14, 1964, some 4 hours after the statutory deadline, petitioner discovered that the affidavit had not left the Duluth post office. It was, therefore, not presented to the office of the secretary of state until Wednesday, July 15, 1964.

Minn. St. 202.06, subd. 2, prohibits the secretary of state from receiving affidavits of candidacy after the statutory deadline has elapsed. Depositing the affidavit in the United States post office does not constitute filing within the meaning of the statute. State ex rel. O'Hearn v. Erickson, 152 Minn. 349, 188 N.W. 736. The petition is therefore denied.

Petition denied.


Summaries of

Walter John Harris v. Joseph L. Donovan

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Jul 31, 1964
129 N.W.2d 797 (Minn. 1964)

holding that depositing affidavit of candidacy in mail does not constitute "filing" within meaning of statute

Summary of this case from Butts v. Bysiewicz

In Harris v. Donovan, 269 Minn. 574, 129 N.W.2d 797, the Minnesota Supreme Court followed the holding in the Erickson case and again held that depositing an affidavit of candidacy in the mail does not constitute filing within the meaning of the statute.

Summary of this case from Johnson v. Herseth
Case details for

Walter John Harris v. Joseph L. Donovan

Case Details

Full title:WALTER JOHN HARRIS v. JOSEPH L. DONOVAN

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Jul 31, 1964

Citations

129 N.W.2d 797 (Minn. 1964)
129 N.W.2d 797

Citing Cases

Smith v. Kiffmeyer

Thus, we have twice held that depositing an affidavit of candidacy in the mail within the filing period does…

Miles Construction Co. v. Krumrey

Defendants rely primarily on the absolute provision of § 514.11 and argue that there was no absolute "loss of…