From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walsh v. French

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 10, 1982
409 So. 2d 1131 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. 81-612.

February 10, 1982.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, R. William Rutter, Jr., J.

Edna L. Caruso and Schuler Wilkerson, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Richard W. Groner of Moyle, Jones Flanigan, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellees.


This is an appeal from a non-final order denying a petition for preliminary injunction. We affirm.

Appellant has failed to demonstrate the trial court abused its discretion in denying his petition for temporary injunction. Appellant failed to establish the essential criteria for a preliminary injunction, to wit: (1) irreparable harm; (2) a clear legal right; and (3) an inadequate remedy at law. Dania Jai-Alai International, Inc. v. Murua, 375 So.2d 57 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); State Dept. of Health and Rehabilitative Services v. Artis, 345 So.2d 1109 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).

The order denying plaintiff's petition for temporary injunction is affirmed.

BERANEK and HERSEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Walsh v. French

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 10, 1982
409 So. 2d 1131 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

Walsh v. French

Case Details

Full title:JOHN F. WALSH, APPELLANT, v. THOMAS W. FRENCH, ET AL., APPELLEES

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Feb 10, 1982

Citations

409 So. 2d 1131 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

Parker v. Gordon

No cause of action known to us could invoke a permanent ban on the appellant communicating with the co-owners…

National Adoption Counseling v. State

To be entitled to a temporary injunction the petitioner must allege and show that he has a clear legal right…