Opinion
January 22, 1996
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Miller, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly refused to find that the defendant and the plaintiff's employer were engaged in a joint venture (see generally, Natuzzi v Rabady, 177 A.D.2d 620; Yonofsky v Wernick, 362 F. Supp. 1005). Therefore, under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly found that the defendant was not entitled to benefit from the immunity to suit conferred by the Workers' Compensation Law. Santucci, J.P., Altman, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.