From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walsh-Jones Agency, Inc. v. Rutecki

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 23, 1994
210 A.D.2d 953 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

December 23, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Joslin, J.

Present — Balio, J.P., Lawton, Fallon, Wesley and Doerr, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly dismissed four counterclaims and the third-party complaint of Victor J. Rutecki (defendant). A shareholder may not sue in an individual capacity for a wrong committed against a corporation (see, Abrams v Donati, 66 N.Y.2d 951, 953). The court properly refused to grant defendant summary judgment on the fourth counterclaim and third cause of action in the third-party complaint because defendant failed to meet his burden of establishing entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see, Lindsay v Potter, 163 A.D.2d 870).

The court properly limited the accounting of the assets of the corporation. Defendant's claims to the insurance commissions were properly dismissed and the court previously had determined that the insurance expirations, renewals and customer lists have no value as a matter of law and were not to be considered in the accounting.

Finally, we reject the contention that the court abused its discretion by refusing to award defendant counsel fees and costs.


Summaries of

Walsh-Jones Agency, Inc. v. Rutecki

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 23, 1994
210 A.D.2d 953 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Walsh-Jones Agency, Inc. v. Rutecki

Case Details

Full title:WALSH-JONES AGENCY, INC., et al., Respondents, v. VICTOR J. RUTECKI…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 23, 1994

Citations

210 A.D.2d 953 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
621 N.Y.S.2d 1020