From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walsei v. Kings Plaza Replacement Serv., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 12, 1997
239 A.D.2d 408 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

May 12, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Yoswein, J.).


Ordered that the appeals by Richard J. Lyons are dismissed, as he is not aggrieved by the judgment or the amended judgment; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal by Anco Air Conditioning, Inc., from the judgment is dismissed, as the judgment was superseded by the amended judgment; and it is further,

Ordered that the amended judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from by Anco Air Conditioning, Inc., on the facts, and as an exercise of discretion, and a new trial is granted on the issue of damages only unless, within 20 days after service upon the plaintiffs Kathleen Walsh and Sean Walsh of a copy of this decision and order with notice of entry, the plaintiffs Kathleen Walsh and Sean Walsh serve and file in the Office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Kings County, a written stipulation consenting to decrease the verdict as to Kathleen Walsh from the principal sum of $400,000 to the principal sum of $100,000, representing $40,000 for past pain and suffering and $60,000 for future pain and suffering, and to decrease the verdict as to Sean Walsh from the principal sum of $50,000 to the principal sum of $20,000, respectively, and to the entry of an appropriate amended judgment; in the event that the plaintiffs Kathleen Walsh and Sean Walsh so stipulate, then the amended judgment, as so decreased and amended, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the defendant Anco Air Conditioning, Inc., payable by the plaintiffs Kathleen Walsh and Sean Walsh, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for the entry of an appropriate amended judgment.

Contrary to the contention of the defendant Anco Air Conditioning, Inc. (hereinafter Anco), the plaintiffs' medical experts sufficiently established that the plaintiffs Kathleen Walsh and Sean Walsh each suffered serious injuries within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d). The car accident caused Kathleen Walsh to suffer a herniated disc at the L5-S1 level and aggravated her previous injury at the L4-L5 level. The accident caused the S-1 radiculopathy of Sean Walsh, which caused him pain and significantly restricted his movements for over 180 days after the accident (see, Washington v. Mercy Home for Children, 232 A.D.2d 549; cf., Andre v. Seem, 234 A.D.2d 325).

While the amount of damages to be awarded for personal injuries is primarily a question for the jury (see, Schare v. Welsbach Elec. Corp., 138 A.D.2d 477, 478), the award may be set aside when it deviates materially from what would be reasonable compensation (see, CPLR 5502[c]; Ramos v. Ramos, 234 A.D.2d 439; Gaetan v. New York City Tr. Auth., 213 A.D.2d 510). Considering the nature and extent of the injuries sustained by Kathleen Walsh, the permanence and extent of the pain caused by those injuries, and the loss, if any, of enjoyment of life (see, Nussbaum v. Gibstein, 73 N.Y.2d 912), the $400,000 award for Kathleen Walsh's herniated disc at the L5-S1 level and aggravation of her previous spinal injury at the L4-L5 level is excessive to the extent indicated (cf., Burgos v. Lovell Realty, 229 A.D.2d 558; see generally, Poturniak v. Rupcic, 232 A.D.2d 541; Colezetti v. Pircio, 214 A.D.2d 926; Clanton v. Agoglitta, 206 A.D.2d 497; Hulsen v. Morrison, 206 A.D.2d 459). Moreover, the $50,000 award for the nonpermanent S-1 radiculopathy suffered by Sean Walsh is excessive to the extent indicated (see generally, Ventriglio v. Active Airport Serv., 234 A.D.2d 451; Colezetti v. Pircio, supra; Clanton v. Agoglitta, supra).

Anco's remaining contention is without merit.

Miller, J.P., Sullivan, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Walsei v. Kings Plaza Replacement Serv., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 12, 1997
239 A.D.2d 408 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Walsei v. Kings Plaza Replacement Serv., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:KATHLEEN WALSEI et al., Respondents, v. KINGS PLAZA REPLACEMENT SERVICE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 12, 1997

Citations

239 A.D.2d 408 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
658 N.Y.S.2d 345

Citing Cases

Wan v. Schanzer

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs. We agree with the Supreme Court that there is an issue of…

Wallace v. Stonehenge Group

The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the…