From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wallsmith v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Sep 14, 1983
465 A.2d 129 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1983)

Summary

In Wallsmith, this Court held that failure to report part-time earnings disqualified the claimant from receiving any UC benefits and made the full amount of benefits subject to recoupment.

Summary of this case from Morris v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review

Opinion

September 14, 1983.

Unemployment compensation — Recoupment.

1. A delinquent unemployment compensation claimant who failed to report part-time earnings is disqualified from receiving any benefits, so all compensation previously paid is properly subject to full recoupment. [165]

Submitted on briefs June 8, 1983, to Judges WILLIAMS, JR., CRAIG and MacPHAIL, sitting as a panel of three.

Appeal, No. 3119 C.D. 1981, from the Order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review in the case of In Re: Claim of Noris Wallsmith, No. B-201219.

Application to the Office of Employment Security for unemployment compensation benefits. Application denied and fault overpayment assessed. Applicant appealed to the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review. Appeal denied. Applicant appealed to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Held: Affirmed.

Bernard D. Cullen, Brady, Lindner Cullen, for petitioner.

Charles Donahue, Associate Counsel, with him Richard L. Cole, Jr., Chief Counsel, for respondent.


Noris Wallsmith (Claimant) appeals from an Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) order denying benefits under Section 401(b) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law) and, pursuant to Section 804(a) of the Law, ordering recoupment of a fault overpayment for weeks during which Claimant did not report part-time earnings to the Office of Employment Security (OES).

Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P. S. § 801(b). Section 401(b) provides in pertinent part:

Compensation shall be payable to any employe who is or becomes unemployed, and who —

. . . .
(b) Has registered for work at, and thereafter continued to report to an employment office in accordance with such regulations as the secretary may prescribe. . . .

Section 804(a), 43 P. S. § 874(a), pertinently provides:

(a) Any person who by reason of his fault has received any sum as compensation under this act to which he was not entitled shall be liable to repay to the Unemployment Compensation Fund to the credit of the Compensation Account a sum equal to the amount so received by him. . . .

The Board's factual findings are not disputed. Upon being validly separated from employment, OES deemed Claimant to be eligible for a weekly benefit amount of $120.00, a weekly dependency allowance of $8.00 and a partial benefit credit of $48.00. From week ending October 4, 1980 through December 27, 1980, a period of thirteen weeks, Claimant received unemployment compensation totaling $1,664.00. Coextensively, Claimant worked part-time as a sales clerk earning weekly wages which exceeded her partial benefit credit by varying amounts.

Although Claimant read and understood the OES information booklet which mandated that all wages earned during each claim period be reported, Claimant failed to report her part-time earnings to the compensation authorities. The referee's decision, summarily affirmed by the Board, determined Claimant to be ineligible for benefits under Section 401(b) of the Law and ordered the recoupment of the $1,664.00 fault overpayment pursuant to Section 804(a) of the Law.

Claimant asserts that the recoupable, fault overpayment should not equal the amount of total benefits received, $1,664.00, but the sum of the amounts by which Claimant's weekly part-time earnings exceeded her partial benefit credit. Rather than being disqualified from receiving all benefits, Claimant would, therefore, remain eligible for her weekly benefit rate less the amount by which her part-time wages exceeded her partial benefit credit.

Claimant's unsupported contention is meritless in light of our holding in Morocco v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 38 Pa. Commw. 285, 392 A.2d 913 (1978). In Morocco, the Board ordered the recoupment of fault overpayments made to a claimant who failed to report weekly part-time wages (in excess of his partial benefit credit) to OES. In rejecting an argument identical to the one proffered sub judice (recommending partial benefits for claimants who knowingly fail to notify OES of their weekly part-time earnings), we held, citing Section 801(b) of the Law, the delinquent claimant to be disqualified from receiving any benefits; all compensation thus being properly subject to full recoupment under Section 804(a) of the Law. Id. See, Rohrbach v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 69 Pa. Commw. 172, 450 A.2d 323 (1982); Summers v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 60 Pa. Commw. 146, 430 A.2d 1046 (1981).

Section 801(b), 43 P. S. § 871(b), provides in part:

(b) Whoever . . . knowingly fails to disclose a material fact to obtain or increase any compensation or other payment . . . may be disqualified. . . .

We accordingly affirm the order of the Board.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 14th day of September, 1983, the Order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, dated November 17, 1981, at Decision No. B-201219, is affirmed.


Summaries of

Wallsmith v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Sep 14, 1983
465 A.2d 129 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1983)

In Wallsmith, this Court held that failure to report part-time earnings disqualified the claimant from receiving any UC benefits and made the full amount of benefits subject to recoupment.

Summary of this case from Morris v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review
Case details for

Wallsmith v. Commonwealth

Case Details

Full title:Noris Wallsmith, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Unemployment…

Court:Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 14, 1983

Citations

465 A.2d 129 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1983)
465 A.2d 129

Citing Cases

Morris v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review

Claimant argues that any fault overpayment should not include the partial benefit she would have been…