holding that a challenge to the timing of the habitual offender status hearing was, in fact, a motion for correction of sentence imposed in an illegal manner that was required to be filed within 90 days of sentencing
Summary of this case from Hicks v. StateNo. 360, 2006.
January 11, 2007.
Appeal from the Superior Cr 30100217DI.
Decisions Without Published Opinions Affirmed.
holding that a challenge to the timing of the habitual offender status hearing was, in fact, a motion for correction of sentence imposed in an illegal manner that was required to be filed within 90 days of sentencing
Summary of this case from Hicks v. StateFull title:Walley v. State
Court:Supreme Court of Delaware
Date published: Jan 11, 2007
And just as it does with any other type of Rule 35 application, when considering a motion for sentence…
State v. WalleyThey were carefully and fully considered in the Commissioner's Report and Recommendation, Mr. Walley's direct…