From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wallach v. Unger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 28, 2008
48 A.D.3d 360 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2926.

February 28, 2008.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter B. Tolub, J.), entered December 12, 2006, which, in an action for legal malpractice, granted defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Schwartz Ponterio, PLLC, New York (Matthew F. Schwartz of counsel), for appellant.

Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman Dicker, LLP, New York (Robert J. Pariser of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Lippman, P.J., Friedman, Williams and Acosta, JJ.


The action is barred by the unappealed order that recognized defendants' charging lien in the underlying action in which defendants were discharged by plaintiff ( Smira v Roper, Barandes Fertel, 302 AD2d 305; Molinaro v Bedke, 281 AD2d 242). This result is not affected by the parties' stipulation in which defendants agreed not to pursue the charging lien until after the disposition of the instant action. Since the charging lien had already been imposed, the stipulation merely deferred the proceeding for fixing the amount of defendants' fee.


Summaries of

Wallach v. Unger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 28, 2008
48 A.D.3d 360 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Wallach v. Unger

Case Details

Full title:GALE ANN WALLACH, Appellant, v. UNGER STUTMAN, LLP, et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 28, 2008

Citations

48 A.D.3d 360 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 1799
853 N.Y.S.2d 295

Citing Cases

Lusk v. Weinstein

Plaintiff was a party to the underlying matrimonial action in which she retained defendant Parker to…

Jay v. Gallagher

By fixing the value of the defendant attorney's services, the court necessarily concludes that there is no…