From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wallace v. Jones

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 16, 1909
195 N.Y. 511 (N.Y. 1909)

Opinion

Argued February 25, 1909

Decided March 16, 1909

Thomas Young for appellant.

James W. Treadwell and Fred Ingraham for respondents.


Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the money having been paid before the action was commenced, no action for its recovery against the defendants jointly could be maintained unless on proof of collusion on the part of those defendants who did not receive the money; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, EDWARD T. BARTLETT, HAIGHT, VANN, WILLARD BARTLETT and CHASE, JJ.


Summaries of

Wallace v. Jones

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 16, 1909
195 N.Y. 511 (N.Y. 1909)
Case details for

Wallace v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE WALLACE, Appellant, v . WILLIAM H. JONES et al., Respondents

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 16, 1909

Citations

195 N.Y. 511 (N.Y. 1909)
88 N.E. 1134

Citing Cases

Stetler v. McFarlane

Audit, however innocent, does not avail as a retroactive grant of power, to give validity to action in excess…

Wadsworth v. Erwin

The rule of collusion, fraud and bad faith is even extended to cases where a joint liability is sought, the…