From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wallace v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jan 25, 2018
157 A.D.3d 1171 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

524705

01-25-2018

In the Matter of Lusher WALLACE, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Lusher Wallace, Coxsackie, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.


Lusher Wallace, Coxsackie, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Egan Jr., J.P., Devine, Mulvey, Aarons and Rumsey, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to challenge a tier III disciplinary determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's institutional account. To the extent that petitioner seeks to be restored to the status that he enjoyed prior to the disciplinary determination, he is not entitled to this relief (see Matter of Smart v. Annucci, 155 A.D.3d 1289, 1289, 63 N.Y.S.3d 910 [2017] ; Matter of Stone v. Annucci, 155 A.D.3d 1214, 1214, 63 N.Y.S.3d 910 [2017] ). Accordingly, and inasmuch as petitioner otherwise has received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Thousand v. Kirkpatrick, 153 A.D.3d 1506, 1507, 59 N.Y.S.3d 919 [2017] ; Matter of Harrison v. Annucci, 153 A.D.3d 1495, 1495, 61 N.Y.S.3d 386 [2017] ).

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Egan Jr., J.P., Devine, Mulvey, Aarons and Rumsey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wallace v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jan 25, 2018
157 A.D.3d 1171 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

Wallace v. Annucci

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LUSHER WALLACE, Petitioner, v. ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 25, 2018

Citations

157 A.D.3d 1171 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 498
67 N.Y.S.3d 513

Citing Cases

Gonzalez v. Kirkpatrick

Although petitioner requests that this Court nonetheless review the matter, the questions presented do not…

Dallas v. Annucci

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively…