From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wall v. Saul

United States District Court, Southern District of West Virginia
Nov 9, 2021
Civil Action 2:20-cv-00460 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 9, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:20-cv-00460

11-09-2021

ROGER WALL, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JOHN T. COPENHAVER, JR. SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

This action was previously referred to Dwane L. Tinsley, United States Magistrate Judge, who has submitted his Proposed Findings and Recommendation ("PF&R") pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

The court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendation entered by the magistrate judge on June 2, 2021. The magistrate judge recommends that the court "deny Claimant's request to reverse the Commissioner's decision, grant the Commissioner's request to affirm his decision, affirm the final decision of the Commissioner, and dismiss this action from the Court's docket." PF&R 18 (emphases and citations omitted). The plaintiff, represented by counsel, has not objected to the PF&R.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. The PF&R be, and hereby is, adopted by the court;
2. The plaintiff's request to reverse the Commissioner's decision be, and hereby is, denied;
3. The Commissioner's request to affirm his decision be, and hereby is, granted;
4. The Commissioner's decision be, and hereby is, affirmed; and
5. The plaintiff's action be, and hereby is, dismissed, with prejudice, and removed from the docket of the court.

The Clerk is directed to forward copies of this written opinion and order to all counsel of record and the United States Magistrate Judge.


Summaries of

Wall v. Saul

United States District Court, Southern District of West Virginia
Nov 9, 2021
Civil Action 2:20-cv-00460 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Wall v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:ROGER WALL, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of West Virginia

Date published: Nov 9, 2021

Citations

Civil Action 2:20-cv-00460 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 9, 2021)

Citing Cases

Brenda H. v. O'Malley

This Court has recognized that mental limitations identified using the psychiatric review technique do not…

Vanessa L. v. O'Malley

It is noted by the parties that this District has recognized that mental limitations identified using the…