From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Vazquez

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 12, 2009
1:05-cv-00709-OWW-GSA (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2009)

Opinion

1:05-cv-00709-OWW-GSA (PC).

February 12, 2009


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING (DOCUMENT #55) 30-DAY DEADLINE


Plaintiff, Harold Walker ("plaintiff"), is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 6, 2009, defendants Sandoval and Welch ("defendants") filed a motion to extend time to file a responsive pleading. Good cause having been presented to the court and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

Defendants are granted thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order in which to file a responsive pleading, in response to plaintiff's first amended complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Walker v. Vazquez

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 12, 2009
1:05-cv-00709-OWW-GSA (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2009)
Case details for

Walker v. Vazquez

Case Details

Full title:HAROLD WALKER, Plaintiff, v. VAZQUEZ, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 12, 2009

Citations

1:05-cv-00709-OWW-GSA (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2009)

Citing Cases

Real v. Walker

Because there is no right to any particular grievance process, plaintiff cannot state a cognizable civil…

Jones v. Cannedy

Because there is no right to any particular grievance process, plaintiff cannot state a cognizable civil…