From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Apr 8, 1970
424 F.2d 278 (5th Cir. 1970)

Summary

holding that "only where a [habeas] petitioner . . . has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis and his application is pending before the court is that petitioner is entitled to be furnished copies of court records without costs."

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Hernandez

Opinion

No. 28649 Summary Calendar.

April 8, 1970.

Jack Aaron Walker, pro se.

John W. Stokes, Jr., U.S. Atty., J. Owen Forrester, Asst. U.S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.

Before GEWIN, GOLDBERG and DYER, Circuit Judges.


Appellant Walker, a federal prisoner, filed his motion in the District Court requesting a copy of his indictment and transcripts of his arraignment and sentencing. He has no appeal pending, nor has he filed or attempted to file a motion to vacate sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255, or a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the District Court. The District Court denied the motion. We affirm.

Pursuant to Rule 18 of the Rules of this Court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir. 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I; and Huth v. Southern Pacific Company, 5 Cir. 1969, 417 F.2d 526; Part I.

Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 2250 provides that only where a petitioner for the writ of habeas corpus has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis and his application is pending before the court is that petitioner entitled to be furnished copies of court records without cost. Harless v. United States, 5 Cir. 1964, 329 F.2d 397. A federal prisoner is not entitled to obtain copies of court records at Government expense for the purpose of searching the record for possible error. Harless v. United States, supra; Culbert v. United States, 10 Cir. 1964, 325 F.2d 920; Ketcherside v. United States, 6 Cir. 1963, 317 F.2d 807.

The judgment below is

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Walker v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Apr 8, 1970
424 F.2d 278 (5th Cir. 1970)

holding that "only where a [habeas] petitioner . . . has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis and his application is pending before the court is that petitioner is entitled to be furnished copies of court records without costs."

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Hernandez

holding that "only where a [habeas] petitioner...has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis and his application is pending before the court is that petitioner entitled to be furnished copies of court records without costs."

Summary of this case from United States v. Lopez

holding that "only where a [habeas] petitioner...has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis and his application is pending before the court is that petitioner entitled to be furnished copies of court records without costs."

Summary of this case from United States v. Hurtado

holding that "only where a [habeas] petitioner...has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis and his application is pending before the court is that petitioner entitled to be furnished copies of court records without costs."

Summary of this case from United States v. Coime-Aguno

holding a federal prisoner is not entitled to copies of court records at Government expense to search for possible error

Summary of this case from United States v. Jimenez-Morales

holding that "only where a [habeas] petitioner ... has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis and his application is pending before the court is that petitioner is entitled to be furnished copies of court records without costs."

Summary of this case from United States v. Monroe

holding a federal prisoner is not entitled to copies of court records at Government expense to search for possible error

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Dade

affirming the denial of a motion requesting an indictment and transcripts because " federal prisoner is not entitled to obtain copies of court records at Government expense for the purpose of searching the record for possible error"

Summary of this case from United States v. Cuya

affirming district court's denial of transcript where § 2255 motion was not pending

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Horvath

affirming the denial of a motion requesting an indictment and transcripts because “ federal prisoner is not entitled to obtain copies of court records at Government expense for the purpose of searching the record for possible error”

Summary of this case from United States v. Keelen

affirming the denial of a motion requesting an indictment and transcripts because " federal prisoner is not entitled to obtain copies of court records at Government expense for the purpose of searching the record for possible error"

Summary of this case from United States v. Basic

stating that " federal prisoner is not entitled to obtain copies of court records at Government expense for the purpose of searching the record for possible error"

Summary of this case from United States v. Padgett
Case details for

Walker v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Jack Aaron WALKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Apr 8, 1970

Citations

424 F.2d 278 (5th Cir. 1970)

Citing Cases

Walton v. Davis

See United States v. MacCollum, 426 U.S. 317, 325-26 (1976). However, 28 U.S.C. § 2250 states that a movant…

U.S. v. Sizemore

However, to be entitled to request documents under this section or under 28 U.S.C. 753(f), Sizemore must have…