holding defendant abandoned his right to self-representation after filing a single-page "motion to request to proceed pro se," by never raising the issue at "critical junctures before trial" and continuing to allow his attorneys to represent him until the eighth day of trial
Summary of this case from State v. StallingsNo. 517, 2005.
February 15, 2007.
Appeal from the Superior Cr 0405000068.
Decisions Without Published Opinions AFFIRMED.
holding defendant abandoned his right to self-representation after filing a single-page "motion to request to proceed pro se," by never raising the issue at "critical junctures before trial" and continuing to allow his attorneys to represent him until the eighth day of trial
Summary of this case from State v. StallingsFull title:Walker v. State
Court:Supreme Court of Delaware
Date published: Feb 15, 2007
Where the trial court makes a factual finding that turns on the credibility of a witness, its finding "may…
Walker v. PhelpsII. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The factual history is recounted from the Delaware Supreme Court's…