From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. State

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division
Jul 21, 2008
No. 4:08CV00903 ERW (E.D. Mo. Jul. 21, 2008)

Opinion

No. 4:08CV00903 ERW.

July 21, 2008


ORDER AND MEMORANDUM


This matter is before the Court upon the application of DeMun D. Walker for leave to commence this action without payment of the required filing fee. Upon consideration of the financial information provided with the application, the Court finds that the applicant is financially unable to pay any portion of the filing fee.

Petitioner, an inmate at the Eastern Reception, Diagnostic and Correctional Center, seeks release from confinement pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner states that he is challenging his November 20, 2001 conviction for unlawful use of a weapon, stealing a motor vehicle, and burglary, imposed by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Missouri, as well as the revocation of his probation on October 24, 2002.

The Court's records show that petitioner has previously brought a § 2254 application for a writ of habeas corpus challenging his November 20, 2001 conviction and October 24, 2002 parole revocation on the same grounds as those asserted in the instant action, and that this Court dismissed the petition as time-barred. See Walker v. State of Missouri, No. 4:07-CV-1859-ERW (E.D. Mo.). Petitioner appealed, and on July 1, 2008, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals denied petitioner's application for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal. See Walker v. State of Missouri, No. 08-1817 (8th Cir. 2008).

The instant action is duplicative of Walker v. State of Missouri, No. 4:07-CV-1859-ERW (E.D. Mo.), and hence, is time-barred.

Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #2] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no order to show cause shall issue as to the respondent, because the instant petition is time-barred under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). See Walker v. State of Missouri, No. 4:07-CV-1859-ERW (E.D. Mo.).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED.

An order of dismissal shall accompany this order and memorandum.


Summaries of

Walker v. State

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division
Jul 21, 2008
No. 4:08CV00903 ERW (E.D. Mo. Jul. 21, 2008)
Case details for

Walker v. State

Case Details

Full title:DEMUN D. WALKER, Petitioner, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division

Date published: Jul 21, 2008

Citations

No. 4:08CV00903 ERW (E.D. Mo. Jul. 21, 2008)

Citing Cases

Walker v. St. Louis Cnty.

Therefore, even if plaintiff were granted in forma pauperis status, his claims would be subject to dismissal.…