From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Owens

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1929
149 S.E. 374 (N.C. 1929)

Opinion

(Filed 11 September, 1929.)

Ejectment C b — Paper-writing which is not deed, will, lease, nor contract specifically enforceable is inadmissible as evidence in ejectment.

A paper-writing expressing that the deceased signer is to let O. have certain described property at the signer's death, O. to keep all buildings in good condition, and at the death of O. "this property goes back" to the signer's estate is inoperative as a deed, as it contains no apt word of conveyance and not being under seal, or as a will or as a lease or contract specifically enforceable, and will not be received in evidence in an action in ejectment.

APPEAL by defendants from Cowper, Special Judge, at April Term, 1929, of CURRITUCK.

Chester Morris and Ehringhaus Hall for plaintiffs.

Thos. J. Markham for defendants.


Civil action in ejectment.

It is admitted that both parties claim title to the land in controversy under Jordan Poyner, deceased. The plaintiffs offered evidence of a fee-simple title in themselves and rested. The defendants then offered the following paper-writing, registered in Book 25, page 63, of the registry of Currituck County, as the only evidence of their right to hold the property during the life of A. A. Owens:

"Feb. 10th, 1922. This is to certify that I, Jordan Poyner, and to let A. A. Owens have the following property at my death. (Description not in dispute.) A. A. Owens is to keep all buildings in good condition. At his death this property goes back to Jordan Poyner's estate. (Signed) Jordan Poyner."

Objection having been made, the instrument was excluded on the ground that it conveys no title to the land described therein. Exception by the defendants.

Verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiffs, from which the defendants appeal, assigning as error the exclusion of the paper-writing offered by them as evidence of their title.


The paper-writing in question was properly excluded as evidence. It is not a deed, for it contains no apt words of conveyance, and is not under seal. Fisher v. Owens, 132 N.C. 686, 44 S.E. 369. It is not a will, nor was it offered as such for probate. Neither is it a lease or contract specifically enforceable. It conveys no interest to A. A. Owens who claims a life estate in the property under said instrument.

No error.


Summaries of

Walker v. Owens

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1929
149 S.E. 374 (N.C. 1929)
Case details for

Walker v. Owens

Case Details

Full title:MARY JANE WALKER AND L. N. WALKER v. APPOLLAS OWENS AND MARVIN ROBERTSON

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Sep 1, 1929

Citations

149 S.E. 374 (N.C. 1929)
149 S.E. 374

Citing Cases

George v. American Ry. Express Co.

The counts were subject to demurrer. 6 Cyc. 370; S.W. Ala. Ry. Co. v. Maddox Son, 146 Ala. 539, 41 So. 9;…