From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Nichols

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Nov 13, 2013
No. 1:13-cv-00259-GZS (D. Me. Nov. 13, 2013)

Opinion

No. 1:13-cv-00259-GZS

11-13-2013

SANDRA WALKER, Plaintiff, v. RALPH NICHOLS, et al., Defendants


ORDER AFFIRMING THE

RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

No objections having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision (ECF No. 33) filed October 22, 2013, the Recommended Decision is AFFIRMED.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. That Defendants' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 28) is GRANTED as to all counts of the complaint to the extent the counts are brought against the moving defendants.
2. That Plaintiff shall have sixty (60) days from the date of this Order to identify her "John Doe" defendants and to amend her complaint by including identities and specific factual predicates upon which she would base a theory of liability as to any "John Doe" defendant. Failure to move to amend within said time limit shall result in dismissal with prejudice.

George Z. Singal

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Walker v. Nichols

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Nov 13, 2013
No. 1:13-cv-00259-GZS (D. Me. Nov. 13, 2013)
Case details for

Walker v. Nichols

Case Details

Full title:SANDRA WALKER, Plaintiff, v. RALPH NICHOLS, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Nov 13, 2013

Citations

No. 1:13-cv-00259-GZS (D. Me. Nov. 13, 2013)

Citing Cases

Blais v. Maine

To be clear - this immunity insulates a state from suit in federal court "on any claim, whether based in…

Abdisamad v. City of Lewiston

To be clear - this immunity insulates a state from suit in federal court "on any claim, whether based in…