From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. City of Philadelphia

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 22, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-2071 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 22, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-2071.

June 22, 2009


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


Plaintiff, a prisoner at SCI-Retreat, seeks to bring a civil action in forma pauperis, without prepayment of fees or security therefor, asserting claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Pub.L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (April 26, 1996) (the "Act"), which amends 28 U.S.C. § 1915, establishes certain financial requirements for prisoners who are attempting to bring a civil action or file an appeal in forma pauperis.

Suits brought in forma pauperis are governed by 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

Under the Act, a prisoner bringing a civil action in forma pauperis must pay the full amount of the $350 filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). The prisoner must submit a certified copy of his prisoner account statement for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint so the Court can determine how the $350 filing fee will be paid. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). The prisoner must obtain this statement from the appropriate official of each prison at which he was or is confined. Id. The Court must then "assess [the prisoner's financial status] and, when funds exist, collect, as a partial payment of any court fees required by law, an initial partial filing fee of 20 percent of the greater of — (A) the average monthly deposits to the prisoner's account; or (B) the average monthly balance in the prisoner's account for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. . . ."

Based on plaintiff's prisoner account statement, he will not be required to pay an initial partial filing fee. However, an official at any prison at which plaintiff may be incarcerated will be directed to deduct, each time that the balance in plaintiff's prisoner account exceeds $10, an amount no greater than 20 percent of the money credited to plaintiff's account during the preceding month and forward that amount to the Clerk of Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania until the entire filing fee is paid.

Plaintiff may not have known when he brought this action that he must pay the filing fee, and that even if the full filing fee, or any part of it, has been paid, the Court must dismiss the case if it finds that the action is: (1) frivolous or malicious; (2) fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; or (3) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). If the Court dismisses the case for any of these reasons, the Act does not permit the prisoner to get his filing fee back.

We shall give plaintiff twenty (20) days from the date of this order to decide whether he wants to proceed with this case. If by that time, plaintiff decides not to proceed with the case, he need not pay the $350 filing fee.

Accordingly, this 22nd day of June, 2009, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The petition is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to its reassertion in accordance with the terms of this order;

2. If plaintiff files with the Court within twenty (20) days from the date of this order a notice that he wishes to proceed with this action and thereby obligate himself to pay the $350 filing fee, this action will be reinstated; and

3. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case statistically.


Summaries of

Walker v. City of Philadelphia

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 22, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-2071 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 22, 2009)
Case details for

Walker v. City of Philadelphia

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM JAMES WALKER, JR. v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ET AL

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 22, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-2071 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 22, 2009)

Citing Cases

Vangerve v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Id. at 410. Because nothing in the consolidated complaint suggests that DiStefano acted outside the scope of…