From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Waldman v. Pitcher

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Sep 15, 2011
Case Number: 1:10cv238 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 15, 2011)

Opinion

Case Number: 1:10cv238.

September 15, 2011


ORDER


This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on June 21, 2011 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 30). Subsequently, the defendant filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc. 31) and plaintiffs filed a response to the objections (Doc. 32). Defendant's filed a reply memorandum in support of his objections to the report and recommendation.

The Court entered an Order on August 3, 2011 (Doc. 35) granting plaintiffs request to file a sur-reply by August 16, 2011. Plaintiff did file a Supplemental Memorandum Supporting the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 36).

The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, plaintiffs' motion to dismiss (Doc. 21) is GRANTED.

Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 22) is DENIED AS MOOT.

This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE with the parties to bear their own costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Waldman v. Pitcher

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Sep 15, 2011
Case Number: 1:10cv238 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 15, 2011)
Case details for

Waldman v. Pitcher

Case Details

Full title:Lawrence Waldman, et. al., Plaintiff(s), v. Kenneth B. Pitcher…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Sep 15, 2011

Citations

Case Number: 1:10cv238 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 15, 2011)

Citing Cases

Setty v. Vill. of Russellville

Bridgeport, 583 F.3d at 954; see also Waldman v. Pitcher, No. 1:10-cv-238, 2011 WL 4337046, at *2 (S.D. Ohio…

Kehoe Component Sales Inc. v. Best Lighting Prods., Inc.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, however, “has expressly rejected the contention…