From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wahl v. Wahl

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 11, 1986
122 A.D.2d 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

July 11, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Monroe County, Mark, J.

Present — Doerr, J.P., Denman, Green, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.


Order, insofar as appealed from, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, motion denied and counterclaim reinstated. Memorandum: On plaintiff's motion to dismiss defendant's counterclaim pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), the court erred in ruling on the merits. Unless a motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action is converted by the court to a motion for summary judgment (CPLR 3211 [c]), in which case notice must be given to the parties, it is error to examine affidavits received on the motion for the purpose of determining whether there is evidentiary support for the pleading (Hornstein v Wolf, 109 A.D.2d 129; see also, Rovello v Orofino Realty Co., 40 N.Y.2d 633). Special Term's reliance on Riffat v Continental Ins. Co. ( 104 A.D.2d 301) is misplaced because this is not a claim which is patently false and unprovable.


Summaries of

Wahl v. Wahl

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 11, 1986
122 A.D.2d 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Wahl v. Wahl

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS R. WAHL, Respondent, v. CAROL H. WAHL, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 11, 1986

Citations

122 A.D.2d 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Michael v. Ametelco, Inc.

As plaintiffs correctly pointed out and anticipated in their answering papers, the defendants' introduction…

Liberty Affordable Hous., Inc. v. Maple Court Apartments

has been consistently reiterated by the Court of Appeals since Rovello (see e.g. Godfrey v. Spano, 13 N.Y.3d…