From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wagenaar v. Finkelman

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 17, 1932
162 A. 579 (N.J. 1932)

Opinion

Submitted May 27, 1932 —

Decided October 17, 1932.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam opinion is printed in 9 N.J. Mis. R. 961.

For the appellant, Collins Corbin.

For the respondent, Paul Rittenberg.


The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court, ubi supra. For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, BROGAN, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, DEAR, WELLS, KERNEY, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Wagenaar v. Finkelman

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 17, 1932
162 A. 579 (N.J. 1932)
Case details for

Wagenaar v. Finkelman

Case Details

Full title:NELLIE WAGENAAR, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM, ETC., RESPONDENT, v…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 17, 1932

Citations

162 A. 579 (N.J. 1932)
162 A. 579

Citing Cases

Diamond Rubber Co., Inc. v. Feldstein

And where the fraud is disputed it is a question for the jury. Palmer v. Tomlin, 104 N.J.L. 215; Wagenaar v.…