From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wade v. Portuondo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 6, 2001
289 A.D.2d 663 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

89403

December 6, 2001.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Quincy Wade, Romulus, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Peter G. Crary of counsel), Albany, for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ.


Petitioner challenges a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits the unauthorized use of a controlled substance after his urine sample twice tested positive for the presence of opiates and cannabinoids. Petitioner challenges the determination claiming that a number of procedural errors require its annulment. Although petitioner initially was not provided with a request for urinalysis form, the Hearing Officer corrected the discrepancy and adjourned the hearing to afford petitioner an opportunity to review the document. Accordingly, any alleged deficiencies in the documents provided by the employee assistant were corrected by the Hearing Officer, thereby obviating any prejudice (see, Matter of Matos v. Goord, 267 A.D.2d 730; Matter of Mitchell v. Goord, 266 A.D.2d 614, 615). Even if preserved for our review, we would find petitioner's claim of Hearing Officer bias to be without merit.

Although the proceeding was properly transferred to this Court since the petition raised a substantial evidence issue, petitioner has not raised a substantial evidence issue in his brief and we deem the issue abandoned (see, Matter of Johnson v. Goord, 260 A.D.2d 816).

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Wade v. Portuondo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 6, 2001
289 A.D.2d 663 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Wade v. Portuondo

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of QUINCY WADE, Petitioner, v. LEONARD A. PORTUONDO, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 6, 2001

Citations

289 A.D.2d 663 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
733 N.Y.S.2d 648

Citing Cases

Russell v. Selsky

In any event, petitioner fails to establish that any alleged inadequacies pertaining to the assistant or his…

In the Matter of Martinez v. Goord

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging, among other things, the determination of…