From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wade v. Chase Bank

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 29, 2014
583 F. App'x 291 (4th Cir. 2014)

Opinion

No. 14-1392

09-29-2014

KAYSHEILA RAINS WADE; HENRY L. WADE, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. CHASE BANK, USA NA; FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION; CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC; IBM LENDER BUSINESS PROCESS SERVICE, d/b/a Seterus Incorporated, Defendants - Appellees, and STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant.

Kaysheila Rains Wade, Henry L. Wade, Appellants Pro Se. James Y. Becker, Emily H. Farr, Hamilton Osborne, Jr., HAYNSWORTH, SINKLER & BOYD, PA, Columbia, South Carolina; Brian Cantwell Duffy, Joseph Rutledge Young, III, DUFFY & YOUNG, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina; Shanon J. McGinnis, Shawna Marie Portner, WARGO & FRENCH, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia; Susan B. Shaw, RCO LEGAL PS, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (2:12-cv-03565-RMG) Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kaysheila Rains Wade, Henry L. Wade, Appellants Pro Se. James Y. Becker, Emily H. Farr, Hamilton Osborne, Jr., HAYNSWORTH, SINKLER & BOYD, PA, Columbia, South Carolina; Brian Cantwell Duffy, Joseph Rutledge Young, III, DUFFY & YOUNG, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina; Shanon J. McGinnis, Shawna Marie Portner, WARGO & FRENCH, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia; Susan B. Shaw, RCO LEGAL PS, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kaysheila Rains Wade and Henry L. Wade appeal the district court's orders granting summary judgment to the Defendants in the Wades' civil action regarding payment on an insurance claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wade v. Chase Bank, No. 2:12-cv-03565-RMG (D.S.C. Mar. 24, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Wade v. Chase Bank

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 29, 2014
583 F. App'x 291 (4th Cir. 2014)
Case details for

Wade v. Chase Bank

Case Details

Full title:KAYSHEILA RAINS WADE; HENRY L. WADE, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. CHASE…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 29, 2014

Citations

583 F. App'x 291 (4th Cir. 2014)

Citing Cases

Tederick v. Loancare, LLC

Other federal courts have similarly found that the Fannie Mae Guidelines do not create duties enforceable…

Niesar v. Nemeth

Hawkins v. City of Greenville, 594 S.E.2d 557, 566 (S.C. Ct. App. 2004) (“It is well settled that a…