From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Waddell v. the State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 3, 1917
74 So. 726 (Ala. Crim. App. 1917)

Opinion

Decided April 3, 1917.

APPEAL from Elmore County Court.

Heard before Hon. GASTON GUNTER.

FRANK W. LULL, for appellant. W.L. MARTIN, Attorney General, and HARWELL G. DAVIS, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.



Coy Waddell was convicted of assault with intent to murder and he appeals. Affirmed.


The appellant was tried and convicted of assault with intent to murder. The bill of exceptions in this case was not signed by the trial judge as required by law (Code 1907, § 3019), and therefore cannot be considered by this court. Section 3019 of the Code 1907 provides that bills of exception may be presented at any time within 90 days from the day on which the judgment is entered, and not afterwards. The judge must indorse thereon and as a part of the bill the true date of presenting; and the bill of exceptions must, if correct, be signed by him within 90 days thereafter. In this case, what purports to be a bill of exceptions was presented within the time prescribed by law and was so indorsed by the trial judge; but the bill of exceptions was never signed by the judge at any time, and therefore must be stricken on request of the state.

As the errors insisted upon on this appeal are raised only by the alleged bill of exceptions, they are not before us for review. There appearing no error in the record, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed. — Box, et al. v. South. Ry. Co., 184 Ala. 600, 64 So. 69; Hartselle Co. v. Wilhite, et al., 3 Ala. App. 612, 57 So. 129.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Waddell v. the State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 3, 1917
74 So. 726 (Ala. Crim. App. 1917)
Case details for

Waddell v. the State

Case Details

Full title:Waddell v. The State. Assault with Intent

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Apr 3, 1917

Citations

74 So. 726 (Ala. Crim. App. 1917)
74 So. 726

Citing Cases

Lynn v. Wright

This court has likewise held that in the absence of the signature of the presiding judge we were without…

Hagin v. Cohen

But neither of the indorsements shows the signing of the bill of exceptions as required by section 3019 of…